If I have a fatal flaw, it is that I need to be right—especially when someone else is wrong. As a child, I was an absolute menace about correcting people, and in case you’re wondering whether that’s a great way to make friends, I can confirm it is not. So as I got older, I learned to bite my tongue. Sometimes literally. Tasting a little blood and having friends is preferable to the alternative, because quite often, being right is not worth the social cost.
Take a recent dinner party where a friend confidently announced that we only use 10% of our brains. Just said it, like it’s a fact. It is not a fact. As a science writer who has covered this topic, I could feel my eye beginning to twitch. This is one of the most thoroughly debunked health myths—brain scans show activity across virtually the entire brain—and yet here it was, being delivered with complete confidence over dessert. I managed to stay quiet for approximately 45 seconds before I could not take it anymore. “Actually,” I said, “I wrote an article about that …” He would not back down, mostly because he was using it to support his theory that we are all living inside a simulation, and as I am firmly Team Science, we came to an awkward impasse. The table went silent.
The stakes aren’t always this high, of course. I have also gotten extremely pedantic correcting a friend who kept misquoting Friends, which, in hindsight, was not my finest hour. And on the flip side, I have absolutely corrected people only to discover, with great humility, that they were right and I was wrong. I’m personally grateful when this happens, as I’d genuinely rather know the truth than walk around confidently incorrect. Some people have the opposite preference, however, and those people are everywhere.
If you’ve spent any time in a social media comments section, you already know how deep this urge to correct runs. Some people have made it their entire personality. And in a “post-truth society,” where it’s getting nearly impossible to differentiate between AI videos of bunnies jumping on a trampoline and real adorable pets, it seems imperative that we help each other out. But where, exactly, is the line? Let’s discuss.
Get Reader’s Digest’s Read Up newsletter for more etiquette, humor, cleaning, travel, tech and fun facts all week long.
The case for speaking up
The most obvious argument for correction is that misinformation spreads, takes root and causes actual harm. The American Psychological Association has noted that unchallenged false claims get repeated—and the more a false claim is repeated, the more believable it becomes. It’s a phenomenon known as the illusory truth effect. Eventually, if you say something often enough and loud enough, people believe it’s true. So from this view, letting misinformation slide isn’t polite restraint; it’s potentially complicit.
This applies to the silly stuff too. I love those online threads where people share the ridiculous things they were taught as a child that they believed far into adulthood. For me, it was when my dad told me that the white line divider bumps on the road were there so blind people could drive—you know, like braille for cars. And it didn’t even dawn on me how dumb that was until I said it out loud to a group of work colleagues when I was in my 30s. I still remember the shocked faces of my friends. Not just because I was oh-so-wrong, but because I had apparently graduated college (as the valedictorian, no less) while believing blind people were navigating the interstate via tactile feedback. I was deeply embarrassed but grateful to be corrected. Would you want your friend doing something similar? The secondhand embarrassment alone should motivate us to help each other out.
There are also practical considerations. If someone at work confidently presents incorrect data to leadership, staying quiet to avoid awkwardness could have real consequences. If a friend repeats a medical myth, silence could affect their health decisions. If a loved one’s cherished family story is wrong, it could lead to decades of hurt feelings. Context matters enormously, but so does the subject matter.
There’s also the dignity argument: Correcting someone, done thoughtfully, is actually a form of respect. It treats them as a person capable of handling accurate information, rather than a fragile person who needs to be protected from the truth. And people are often more open to it than you think. Research published in the journal Cognitive Research found that people are generally responsive to factual corrections, and the feared “backfire effect” (where being corrected causes someone to dig in harder) turns out to be far less common than previously thought.
The case against speaking up (and it’s a strong one)
Here’s where things get uncomfortable. Corrections—even accurate ones, even well-intentioned ones—can backfire. And it’s most likely to happen when the correction is addressing things other than clear facts (like feelings), goes against deeply held beliefs, feels condescending, comes from someone the person already distrusts or is delivered when others are watching. Public correction adds a layer of humiliation, and humiliated people rarely say, “You know what? Fair point.”
There’s also the Dunning-Kruger problem on both sides of the equation. Described by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger at Cornell, this is the phenomenon where people who know very little about a subject are blessed with the confidence of a preschooler in an Iron Man costume, while actual experts stay quiet, worrying about all the things they might not know. This leads to a very special kind of argument in which one person has facts, evidence and years of experience, and the other has a YouTube video they half-watched while folding laundry. In these debates, the dumbest person usually wins simply by sheer persistence. So the person you’re correcting may be completely wrong and utterly convinced they’re right.
And here’s the humbling part: so might you. Before opening your mouth, it’s worth a beat of honest self-interrogation. How sure are you, really?
There’s also the social cost. Even when you are right, the act of correcting someone publicly can make you look like you’re prioritizing being right over the feelings of the person you’re with. As Dr. Phil once famously said, “Would you rather be right or be happy?” In group settings, especially, correcting someone can come across as a power move or a performance, or make you look like a know-it-all. As I can personally attest, being correct does not necessarily make you popular.
A few things to consider before you correct
Asking yourself these five questions will help you slow your roll and decide if you should actually utter those fateful words of correction.
1. What is your relationship to the other person? Correcting a close friend is very different than correcting a stranger, an acquaintance, a boss, a date or someone you’ve just met at a dinner party. The closer and more equal the relationship, the more a correction can land as caring rather than condescending (when said in an appropriate way; more on that below). With an acquaintance, the same words can read as an attack. With a boss, the correction can read as insubordination.
2. Is the topic innocuous or heated? Low-stakes factual errors can be overlooked. (Does it really matter what year the movie came out?) Crucial facts without any emotional connection are generally the best received—for example, “The project due date is this coming Friday, not next weekend.”
However, corrections that bump up against someone’s politics, religion or deeply held identity are different territory—not because those beliefs can’t be wrong, but because the social cost of the correction is much higher and the likelihood of success is much lower. You’re not obligated to let dangerous misinformation slide, but know that “I disagree with your take on this political candidate” is not the same thing as correcting a false fact. Spend your social capital wisely.
3. What is your tone? Tone matters more than almost anything else. There’s a world of difference between saying, “Oh, I actually read something different about that” and leading with “You’re completely wrong.” The first invites dialogue; the second invites defensiveness. Framing a correction as a question or as your own uncertainty (“Wait, wasn’t it … ?”) tends to land better than a declarative correction, even when you’re 100% certain. This is also, incidentally, the same principle behind talking to someone with an opposing viewpoint without it devolving into an argument: Lead with curiosity, not judgment.
4. Can you google it on the spot? The ability to fact-check people in real time is an incredible power and, like most superpowers, a potentially dangerous weapon. We’ve all been there: Someone says something dubious, and you have a device in your pocket that can resolve the dispute in 11 seconds. Whether it’s OK to pull it out depends entirely on the relationship and the vibe. Between close friends who do this all the time, it’s fine, even fun. On a first date, whipping out your phone to fact-check mid-sentence can have the other person frantically signaling for the check. Tread lightly.
5. What if you’re the one who’s wrong? This, frankly, is where character is revealed. If you speak up and it turns out you were the incorrect one, you have two options: Dig in (bad), or graciously concede the point (good). “Oh, you’re right! I had that wrong—thank you!” is genuinely one of the most disarming and likable things a person can say. It’s also rare enough that people remember it.
How to correct someone without being a jerk
When you’ve decided a correction is worth making, here’s how to do it and not become the person everyone dreads sitting next to.
- Keep it private when possible. Pulling someone aside after the fact (“Hey, I wanted to mention I think that statistic might be off”) lands much better than correcting them in front of a group. It lets them save face, which people genuinely appreciate.
- Make it about the information, not the person. “I think I read something different about this” is the start of a conversation, not a personal attack.
- Pick your battles. Not every wrong thing needs to be corrected right now, or by you, or even at all. Ask yourself: Does this actually matter? Will correcting it help anyone? Or am I just annoyed that someone said a thing incorrectly? (The answer, if you’re anything like me, is sometimes the third one. But hey, at least we know that about ourselves!)
- Be genuinely open to being wrong yourself. If you’re not willing to concede when you turn out to be incorrect, you don’t actually have the moral authority to correct anyone else.
- Understand what’s really at stake. In public or private settings with high stakes, you have a duty to speak up, even if it’s uncomfortable. When someone is spreading misinformation that could lead to real harm—dangerous medical advice, incorrect safety information or fear-based myths that affect real decisions—staying quiet in the name of social comfort is bad etiquette. You might make an enemy. You might also prevent someone from making a very bad decision. The social rules exist for a reason, but they shouldn’t paralyze you when the situation genuinely warrants action.
The verdict
Correcting someone who’s wrong is not inherently rude, but how you do it determines whether it comes across as helpful or obnoxious. The checklist is simple: Does this actually matter? Are you sure? Are you doing it for the right reason? And can you do it in a way that’s more “by the way” than red-buzzer “INCORRECT”?
The goal isn’t to win. It’s to leave everyone, including yourself, with more accurate information—ideally, with everyone’s dignity left intact. And if someone corrects you? The most gracious thing you can do is listen, consider it and update your view if the evidence warrants it.
Being correctable is more impressive than being right. And knowing when to shut up is—and I say this as someone who let a 10%-of-your-brain comment go exactly 45 seconds before cracking—a vital life skill. One that I am still working on. But hey, interrupting people after 45 seconds is actually a huge improvement from my childhood. Progress!
Have a social situation you can’t stop ruminating on? Email us at advice@tmbi.com, or message Charlotte on Instagram at @CharlotteHiltonAndersen.
Why trust us
Reader’s Digest has published hundreds of etiquette stories that help readers navigate communication in a changing world. We regularly cover topics such as the best messages to send for any occasion, polite habits that aren’t as polite as they seem, email and texting etiquette, business etiquette, tipping etiquette, travel etiquette and more. We’re committed to producing high-quality content by writers with expertise and experience in their field in consultation with relevant, qualified experts. We rely on reputable primary sources, including government and professional organizations and academic institutions as well as our writers’ personal experiences where appropriate. We verify all facts and data, back them with credible sourcing and revisit them over time to ensure they remain accurate and up to date. Read more about our team, our contributors and our editorial policies.
Sources:
- American Psychological Association: “Recommendations for countering misinformation”
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: “Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments”
- Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications: “Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections”
- Nature Reviews Psychology: “The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction”
The post Is It Really Rude to Correct Someone Who’s Wrong? appeared first on Reader's Digest.
from Reader's Digest https://ift.tt/xpY2hT0
Comments
Post a Comment